I worked in last a few days with each_with_object method. Every time when I would like to use some method in Ruby I try read documentation one more time and I look on some example of usage. This time I went through APIdock and I noticed that in theirs documentation is missing one very nice example of usage each_with_object method. I tried to add this missing part there, but without success. In meantime when I’m waiting for message from APIdock support I decided to write short note here about this.
The most useful and I think the most popular usage of each_with_object is putting hash or array as an argument. You can do this like in example below:
[:foo, :bar, :jazz].each_with_object({}) do |item, hash|
hash[item] = item.to_s.upcase
end
=> {:foo=>"FOO", :bar=>"BAR", :jazz=>"JAZZ"}
or
(1..10).each_with_object([]) do |item, array|
array << item ** 2
end
=> [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
I know this examples are trivial, but they show main rules. You don’t need to declare array or hash before your loops for example like this:
array = []
(1..10).each do |item|
array << item ** 2
end
array
=> [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
I know this example can be also replace with map use case. Like this:
(1..10).map { |item| item ** 2 }
=> [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
Other nice example of each_with_object usage is frequency hash:
['one', 'two', 'one', 'one'].each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) do |item, hash|
hash[item] += 1
end
=> {"one"=>3, "two"=>1}
In this case we use hash with default value set to 0 and now counting occurrence is easy and quick. You don’t need to do if statement to be sure that you are nil safe like this:
if hash[item]
hash[item] += 1
else
hash[item] = 0
end
Important note
You cannot use immutable objects like numbers. Example below does not return 55 but 0.
(1..10).each_with_object(0) do |item, sum|
sum += item
end
=> 0
Yes, we can do that in different way:
(1..10).reduce(:+)
=> 55
or
(1..10).inject(:+)
=> 55
or in Rails:
(1..10).sum
=> 55
By the way, what is difference between reduce and inject? There is no difference. This two methods are aliases.
In this place we should add one more thing. inject method we can use similar to each_with_object but order of arguments in block is different and we need always remember to put in last line of block our accumulator value. Look here:
(1..10).inject([]) do |array, item|
array << item ** 2
end
=> [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
or
[:foo, :bar, :jazz].inject({}) do |hash, item|
hash[item] = item.to_s.upcase
hash
end
=> {:foo=>"FOO", :bar=>"BAR", :jazz=>"JAZZ"}
Important note
When we use array << item ** 2 this command always returns all array, but for this second example hash[item] = item.to_s.upcase returns item.to_s.upcase not all hash so we need to remember about adding hash on the end.
And now the missing part for each_with_object. You can use this method also on hash not only on arrays or enumerators. This looks a little bit different than before. Let I show you:
{ foo: 1, bar: 2, jazz: 3 }.each_with_object({}) do |(key, value), hash|
hash[key] = value**2
end
=> {:foo=>1, :bar=>4, :jazz=>9}
or like this
{ foo: 1, bar: 2, jazz: 3 }.each_with_object([]) do |(key, value), array|
array << { id: value, name: key }
end
=> [{:id=>1, :name=>:foo}, {:id=>2, :name=>:bar}, {:id=>3, :name=>:jazz}]
This was quick overview for method each_with_object. I hope you like this examples like I do. If you have any question leave them below and see you next time!
Need help?
If you're looking for a Ruby developer with over a decade of experience, don't hesitate to contact me.
I have experience in a variety of domains, with a focus on short user feedback loops and teamwork. I can help you build a great product.