Things you didn't know about Ruby

Ruby tips and tricks

From time to time, when I create a code, people ask me: Is this working? , or they tell me: I didn’t know that. Being in those situations allows me to understand that something normal for me can be new for someone else. So, today I would like to share with you some Ruby tips and tricks. I hope you will like them.

1. dig default value & nested hashes/arrays

By default, when you use the dig method and the requested key is not in the hash, you will get nil. But we can change this behavior and return whatever we want.

Default behavior:

hash = { foo: { bar: [:a, :b, :c] } }
hash.dig(:hello)

# => nil

Our new behavior:

hash = { foo: { bar: [:a, :b, :c] } }
hash.default_proc = -> (hash, _key) { hash }
hash.dig(:hello, :world)

# => {:foo=>{:bar=>[:a, :b, :c]}}

hash.dig(:hello, :world, :foo, :bar, 2)

# => :c

You can see one more interesting thing here. When you use the dig method in the hash, it doesn’t matter if this is a simple hash only with keys and values like { foo: 1, bar: 2} or a more complex one with nested hashes and arrays like in the example above, you still can get selected value.

hash = { foo: { bar: [:a, :b, :c] } }
hash.dig(:foo, :bar, 2)

# => :c

2. Quick debugging with tap

The most common usage of the tap method for me is to use it as a quick debugger.

class Object
  def debug
    tap { |object| p object }
  end
end

"foo".upcase.debug.reverse

# "FOO"
# => "OOF"

Thanks to this Object class extension, we can see what an object looks like in the middle of the methods chain.

3. Difference between concat and += for Array class

In most cases, we can use the concat and the += methods interchangeably, but there is one important difference between them. Let’s check the example below.

The result we get from both methods is the same.

array = [1, 2, 3]
array.concat([4, 5, 6])

# => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]


array = [1, 2, 3]
array += [4, 5, 6]

# => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Now, let’s check what will happen when we use the tap method with concat and +=.

array = [1, 2, 3]
array.tap { |a| a.concat([4, 5, 6]) }

# => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

concat behaves as we expected. We cannot say the same for +=.

array = [1, 2, 3]
array.tap { |a| a += [4, 5, 6] }

# => [1, 2, 3]

What happened here? First, we need to understand the method tap. Base on the definition from documentation we have:

tap - Yields self to the block, and then returns self. The primary purpose of this method is to “tap into” a method chain, in order to perform operations on intermediate results within the chain.

The main hint in this definition is and then returns self. Let’s check the array object.

array = []
array.object_id

# => 260

array += [4, 5, 6]
array.object_id

# => 280

In the case of +=, we get a new object, but tap is returning the object which was created at the beginning. Let’s compare that with the concat method.

array = []
array.object_id

# => 300

array.concat([4, 5, 6])
array.object_id

# => 300

As you can see here, concat returns the same object which was in the beginning. So, to summarize concat append the new elements to the existing array, while += creates a new array with elements from both the original and additional array.

The last thing for the += method. To get the same result for += as we get for concat, we can use the then method instead of tap. Definition for then based on the documentation is:

then - Yields self to the block and returns the result of the block.

array = [1, 2, 3]
array.then { |a| a += [4, 5, 6] }

# => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

4. split with two arguments

We often use the split method for strings like this:

"ruby:python:java".split(':')

# => ["ruby", "python", "java"]

but there is also a possibility to tell split how many pieces you want to get:

"ruby:python:java".split(':', 1)

# => ["ruby:python:java"]

"ruby:python:java".split(':', 2)

# => ["ruby", "python:java"]

"ruby:python:java".split(':', 3)

# => ["ruby", "python", "java"]

5. String concatenation

There are a lot of possibilities to join strings. Some of them you can find below:

first_name = 'Agnieszka'
last_name = 'Małaszkiewicz'

name = first_name + ' ' + last_name
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

name = first_name << ' ' << last_name
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

name = "#{first_name} #{last_name}"
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

name = [first_name, last_name].join(' ')
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

We have one more way to join strings. We can use space between strings like this:

name = "Agnieszka" " " "Małaszkiewicz"
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

or simpler to see the pattern:

name = "Agnieszka " "Małaszkiewicz"
name

# => "Agnieszka Małaszkiewicz"

At first look, it can be strange that something like this can work in Ruby, but how many times did you split the line with a string? I use that for example in the test description. For example:

it 'calls DeliverCheckInInstructionsForProperty service for properties ' \
    'with check-in instructions delivery enabled' do
  # ...
end

Now the question: Why is it working? Based on what I found, it is related to Ruby source code in parse.y. Based on the answer from Stack Overflow we have:

A Ruby string is either a tCHAR (e.g. ?q), a string1 (e.g. "q", 'q', or %q{q}), or a recursive definition of the concatenation of string1 and string itself, which results in string expressions like "foo" "bar", 'foo' "bar" or ?f "oo" 'bar' being concatenated.

6. Create a hash with a default value

I write about this topic in Ruby Hash article in more detail, right now I want to mention two common uses of this feature.

First, you can declare the same default value for all keys in a hash. It’s pretty useful when we want to count something.

hash = Hash.new(0)
hash[:foo]

# => 0

Now we can count something by using +=.

hash[:bar] += 1
hash[:bar]

# => 1

The second example is declaring a dynamic default value for each key in the hash. For example:

hash = Hash.new { |hash, i| i }
hash[1]

# => 1

hash[35]

# => 35

7. Use proc in case

proc is one of the classes in Ruby, which helps us with functional programming. One interesting usage of proc, which is not often known, is using proc in case. We can create a proc and put it directly to the when condition of the case. See the example below:

payload_1 = {
  event_type: 'ConversationAdded',
  body: 'Test'
}
payload_2 = {
  event_type: 'MessageAdded',
  body: 'Test'
}
payload_3 = {
  body: 'Test'
}

def payload_object(payload)
  message_type_event = proc { |event_type| event_type.include?('Message') }

  case payload[:event_type]
  when nil then 'Message'
  when message_type_event then 'ConversationMessage'
  else
    'None'
  end
end

payload_object(payload_1)

# => "None"

payload_object(payload_2)

# => "ConversationMessage"

payload_object(payload_3)

# => "Message"

8. Call method in different ways

Ruby is an awesome programming language. We can call a method in many different ways. If you are interested in how many ways we can find for calling method, I recommend you to read Gregory Witek’s article 12 ways to call a method in Ruby. I know two more ways to call a method, and I would like to share them with you. To be consistent with Gregory’s article, I will use the same example:

class User
  def initialize(name)
    @name = name
  end

  def hello
    puts "Hello, #{@name}!"
  end

  def method_missing(_)
    hello
  end
end

The first way, I discover in Nick Schwaderer’s presentation from RailsConf 2022 Ruby Archaeology:

user = User.new('Agnieszka')
user::hello

# Hello, Agnieszka!
# => nil

The second way is related to functional programming. We can turn the method name into proc and call on this proc method ===:

user = User.new('Agnieszka')
:hello.to_proc === user

# Hello, Agnieszka!
# => nil

If you want to know more about calling proc by ===, I recommend you to check my article about functional programming.


Need help?

If you're looking for a Ruby developer with over a decade of experience, don't hesitate to contact me.

I have experience in a variety of domains, with a focus on short user feedback loops and teamwork. I can help you build a great product.